Legal Opinion
Application of Anthony J. Urbanic and Francis J. Maurer
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided September 27, 1963No. Patent Appeal 6935PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
''MARTIN,'Judge‘!‘n,This,ds,.,an:,apj)eql from a. decision df the.Board of. Appeals affirming''the „ex-animer’s? rej ection, of claims 2,6 „ to 32, 34 to.37)áh'd.‘39 to 50 1 q'f!'áppeíl,ahts,i'application Serial -’bird, 328,509," filed .December.' 2S, Í952, 'fqr. RIGIDSlíOCIt RESISfÁNÍ:',PVC> 2 >''lSr'o 'ólaím/has been' allowed...........,- -.Appellants,’,.appljoation,; dps,crib.es,a.rigid - dnipact .-pgsistapi., plastic. .composition of^matter^containing,^) a, vipyl .halide polyniQv, e! g,, .a. .vinyl , chloride, homo-polymer o,rj.:a..vinyl,,chloride copolymer, plasticized,:with.,.(II).…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Louis H. Segall v. Marion W. Sims, Ezra C. Hill and Aaron M. KrakowerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- In re LibbyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
3Cited by2 opinions
- M. D. Rutledge v. Boston Woven Hose and Rubber Company, a Division of American Biltrite, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- M. D. Rutledge v. Boston Woven Hose and Rubber Company, a Division of American Biltrite, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978