Legal Opinion

In re Eisenhut

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 17, 1957No. 6274PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, Chief Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals, affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 19, 23 and 25 to 33 as unpatentable over the prior art, in appellant’s application serial No. 217,879, filed March 27, 1951, for “Process for the Manufacture of Washable, Cloth-Like Material From Cellulose Fibres Without Spinning or Weaving.” The foregoing claims are the only claims remaining in the case.

At oral argument, counsel for appellant admitted that the essence of his alleged invention was set forth in claim 19; that the ancillary details included in claims 23 and 25…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re KeplerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  2. Application of SelmiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  3. In re SwensonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  4. In re GreiderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  5. In re ParlantiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. John Doe v. State of Hawaii Dept. of Educ.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2004
  2. Aetna Steel Products Corporation v. Southwest Products Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  3. August Urbanek and Estate of Irene Urbanek, Deceased, August Urbanek, Personal Representative v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. In re LibbyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  5. Application of Ernest C. Adams, Jr., and Alfred H. FreeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API