Legal Opinion

In re Bourdon

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 9, 1957No. 6220PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorley, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office sustaining the action of the Primary Examiner in finally rejecting claims 4 to 7, inclusive, of appellant’s application for a patent on a pneumatic tire, on the ground of lack of invention over the prior art. Claims 4 and 5 are typical of the appealed claims and read:

4. A tire casing comprising a carcass having flexible thread-reinforced side walls, a ground contacting tread portion on the outer periphery o£ said carcass, two superposed, directly adjacent, substantially coextensive layers within and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re KeplerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  2. Application of SelmiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  3. In Re ChristmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  4. In re GardinerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  5. In re BrittonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Application of Edward M. Rothermel and Russell B. Waddell, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  2. Application of James H. Saunders and Paul G. GemeinhardtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  3. Application of Myron Pantzer and Milton FeierCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  4. Aetna Steel Products Corporation v. Southwest Products Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  5. Application of Arthur P. ShepardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API