Legal Opinion

In Re Gauerke

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 30, 1936No. Patent Appeal 3674PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the examiner, rejecting all of the claims, numbered 1 to 14, inclusive, of appellant’s application; the ground of rejection was the lack of patentability of the claims over the cited-prior art.

Nine of the claims are product claims, the remainder being process claims. Claims 1 and 7 are illustrative of the claims and read as follows:

“1. An oil modified polyhydric alcohol-polybasic acid resin comprising a polyhydric alcohol ester of an organic poly-basic…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weis v. WoodmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
  2. In re LangCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Application of FinleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  3. In re LibbyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  4. Application of Ben Jacoby, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  5. Application of Louis H. LibbyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API