Legal Opinion
Hagan v. Fairfield
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 25, 1961No. Civ. 24851PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.
The demurrer of the respondents Joseph W. Fairfield, Vid Rosner and Miriam Benjamin to the appellant Hagan’s amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend. At the same time, the respondents’ motion to dismiss the action on the ground that it was sham and frivolous was granted. The appellant has appealed from the judgment entered pursuant thereto.
A complaint containing one cause of action was filed on April 7, 1959, wherein part of the relief sought was that the defendants be compelled to register the shares of stock of the plaintiff Hagan on the books of Benedict Heights, Inc., and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Parker v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Colvig v. RKO General, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- California Union Insurance Co. v. Trinity River Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- Karp v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Muller v. TannerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.