Karp v. Dunn
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.
Plaintiffs filed the complaint herein on July 2, 1962. Twelve of the defendants appeared by demurrer. Each of the demurrers was sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgments thereupon entered. This action will be referred to either as the "second action” or “instant action. ’ ’
In an earlier action, filed on January 16, 1961, plaintiffs had named Beatrice Dunn and Max Dunn, her husband, as two of the defendants. Max died thereafter and Beatrice was substituted for him as administratrix. The Dunns ’ demurrer to plaintiffs’ third amended complaint in that action was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Guilliams v. Hollywood HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Wulfjen v. DoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Thomson v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Phoenix of Hartford Insurance v. Colony KitchensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Beckstead v. International Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Muller v. TannerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Gross v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.