Legal Opinion

Romano v. II Morrow, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided May 6, 1997No. Civil No. 94-1308-FRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

FRYE, District Judge:

In these related actions, the plaintiffs, all package car drivers for United Parcel Service, allege that they have suffered repetitive stress injuries from using a hand-held computer known as a delivery information acquisition device as part of their jobs. Before the court is plaintiffs’ objections to defendants’ proposed physical examination procedures and request for conditions (# 118).

BACKGROUND

The defendants sought to have a physician or physicians of their choosing conduct physical examinations of the plaintiffs pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 35. On April…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shirsat v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Tri-Met, Inc. v. AlbrechtOregon Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hertenstein v. Kimberly Home Health Care, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
  2. Ornelas v. Southern Tire Mart, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  3. Newman v. San Joaquin Delta Community College DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
  4. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. OverstreetKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Calderon v. Reederei Claus-Peter Offen GmbH & Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API