Legal Opinion

Tri-Met, Inc. v. Albrecht

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1989No. WCB 86-02160; CA A46942; SC S36036PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.

The Workers’ Compensation Law requires that a claimant submit to a requested medical examination and that the claimant’s rights to compensation may be suspended if the claimant refuses to submit to or obstructs the medical examination. ORS 656.325(1). In the present dispute over the extent of claimant’s permanent partial disability, claimant consented to an examination by designated physicians but insisted on the presence of his lawyer at the examination. The physicians refused to examine claimant with the lawyer present, and claimant’s employer asserted that claimant’s demand constituted an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tri-Met, Inc. v. AlbrechtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Romano v. II Morrow, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1997
  2. Darling v. Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Feld v. Robert & Charles Beauty SalonMichigan Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API