Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Overstreet
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided April 24, 2003No. 2002-SC-0032-MRPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, Justice.
The underlying civil action was brought by Appellee Gary Afterkirk against Appellant Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company (“MetLife” 1 ), After- kirk’s uninsured motorists insurer, for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident caused by the alleged negligence of an uninsured motorist. Pursuant to CR 35.01, MetLife moved for an order requiring Afterkirk to submit to a physical examination by Dr. Daniel D. Primm, Jr., an orthopedic surgeon. Alleging that Dr. Primm is biased against personal injury plaintiffs, Afterkirk objected and requested that a…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Peter Mager v. Wisconsin Central Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Cooper v. SchoffstallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Myers v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Southern Financial Life Insurance Co. v. CombsKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
- Curty v. Norton Healthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2018
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.