Legal Opinion
Waranch v. Gulf Insurance Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 27, 1990No. B040422PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, J.
Does a personal injury insurance liability provision for “wrongful entry or eviction, or other invasion of the right of private occupancy” cover only acts which affect rights in real property, or does it cover, as well, an alleged wrongful repossession of an automobile? The trial court concluded that this language did not cover automobiles. We agree and affirm the judgment in favor of the insurer.
Facts
There is no apparent disagreement between the parties as to the operative facts. Respondent Gulf Insurance Company issued an insurance policy to appellant Villa Pacific Building…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Producers Dairy Delivery Co. v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Silberg v. California Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Bareno v. Employers Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Nichols v. Great American Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Fibreboard Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Titan Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Mirpad, LLC v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Red Ball Leasing, Inc. And American Red Ball Transit Company, Inc. v. The Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.