Titan Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FROEHLICH, J.
—Respondent the Titan Corporation (Titan) owned a plant in New Jersey (hereafter the Keasbey site or Keasbey facility) that had been operating since 1906. When Titan decided to close the plant in 1985, it began investigating the extent of its environmental cleanup responsibilities under a New Jersey statute. The investigation revealed the site had some forms of pollution.
Titan then purchased a policy of insurance from appellant Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna). The Aetna policy contained, among other provisions, a “pollution exclusion,” which, on first…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Voorhees v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Producers Dairy Delivery Co. v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Kitsap County v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Kitsap County v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.