Mirpad, LLC v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
In this appeal, we apply the rule that the plain meaning of insurance policy language may be established by considering such language in the context of the entire policy, even though, in other contexts, it might have a different meaning. The question presented by this case is the proper interpretation to be given to the “wrongful eviction” portion of the “personal injury” coverage provisions contained in a standard commercial general liability (CGL) policy. The defendant, appellant and cross-respondent, California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA), argues that due to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Mountain Air Enters., LLC v. Sundowner Towers, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- NYGÅRD, INC. v. Uusi-KerttulaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- United Guaranty Mortgage Indemnity Co. v. Countrywide Financial Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Supreme Laundry Service, LLC v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- State Farm General Insurance v. MintarsihCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.