Legal Opinion

Reserve Insurance Co. v. Pisciotta

California Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1982No. S.F. 24323PublishedCited by 344 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*805Opinion

MOSK, J.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment action filed by Reserve Insurance Company, which sought a determination that a “family member” exclusion in its policy applies to the stepson of the insured. The case raises a number of interrelated issues concerning the potential liabilities of the insured, his broker, Reserve, and an excess insurer for the damages resulting from injuries to the stepson.

Tyler Campbell is the son of Dita Pisciotta and her former husband. After Dita remarried, she and Tyler took up residence with her new husband, John Pisciotta. From that time…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Prentice v. North American Title Guaranty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1963

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by344 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996

339 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API