Bareno v. Employers Life Insurance
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*878Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
We must adjudicate another case involving ambiguous, provisions in a certificate of insurance issued pursuant to a group insurance policy. On countless occasions we have inveighed against the careless draftsmanship of documents of insurance and have decried the evil social consequences that flow from lack of clarity. (E.g., Paramount Properties Co. v. Transamerica Title Ins. Co. (1970) 1 Cal.3d 562, 569-570 [83 Cal.Rptr. 394, 463 P.2d 746]; Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co. (1966) 65 Cal.2d 263, 269-274 [54 Cal.Rptr. 104, 419 P.2d 168]; Ensign v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Erreca v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Elfstrom v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Silberg v. California Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Garcia v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.