Legal Opinion

Red Ball Leasing, Inc. And American Red Ball Transit Company, Inc. v. The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 4, 1990No. 88-3396PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs-appellants brought this diversity suit against the Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (Hartford) to recover for breach of an insurance contract. Both parties moved for summary judgment. On November 4, 1988, the district court entered an order granting summary judgment in favor of Hartford. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

I

BACKGROUND

A. Facts

Red Ball Leasing, Inc. sells and leases trucks and is a wholly owned subsidiary of the other appellant, American Red Ball Transit Company, Inc. For purposes of this appeal,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Argonaut Southwest Insurance Company v. MaupinTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Eli Lilly & Co. v. Home Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Home Insurance Company v. NeilsenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Cincinnati Insurance v. MallonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Stockberger v. Meridian Mutual InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Gatx Leasing Corporation v. National Union Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Collin v. American Empire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Pipefitters Welfare Educational Fund v. Westchester Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Pipefitters Welfare Educational Fund v. Westchester Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. HarveyIndiana Supreme Court · 2006

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API