Legal Opinion

Kilfoil v. Warden

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 1920No. Civ. No. 3157PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

This is an action to quiet title. The complaint is in the usual form. The answer denies all the material allegations of the complaint, except that it is asserted that defendant Julia P. Warden “claims and asserts some right, title or interest in and to said property adverse to plaintiff, and denies that the same are without any right, and alleges that the defendant Julia P. Warden acquired said property under and by virtue of a conveyance from the city tax and license collector of the city of Los Angeles for a delinquent assessment for the improvement of Alhambra Avenue from the east boundary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Winter v. McMillanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Williams v. City of San Pedro Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Di Nola v. AllisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Martin v. LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Redd v. MurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Babcock v. DangerfieldUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Scott v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. McMurrough v. AlbertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Syme v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. San Diego Improvement Co. v. BrodieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API