Legal Opinion

Scott v. Beck

California Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1928No. Docket No. L.A. 8103PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Action to quiet title to lot 93 in tract number 909, situated in the city of Los Angeles. The state ment of the case, as here quoted, is taken from the decision of the first district court of appeal, division one, rendered prior to the order for hearing in this court, and is adopted as part of this decision.

“The complaint alleged title in the plaintiff with right to possession. The averments of the complaint were denied by defendant, who alleged title in himself through a tax deed from the state of California. Neither of the parties to the action was in actual possession of the lot, which was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Biaggi v. RamontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Rockey v. VieuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Bernhard v. WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Jacoby v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Mitchell v. TitusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hall v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Babcock v. DangerfieldUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Sawyer v. Berkeley Securities Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Syme v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. San Diego Improvement Co. v. BrodieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API