Babcock v. Dangerfield
Utah Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellant commenced an action in the district court to quiet title to certain property alleging that he “is now and ever since the year 1916 has been, the owner and entitled to the possession” of said property. The complaint further alleged that “defendants claim some right, title, interest or estate therein, adverse to plaintiff”; that said claims are without merit; and that defendants have no right whatever in the property described. Appellant then prayed that “defendants be required to set forth the nature of their claims”; that it be decreed that defendants have no right, title or…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Parsons v. WeisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Flinn v. BlakemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Davis v. CrumpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Borden v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Norback v. Board of Directors of Church Extension Soc.Utah Supreme Court · 1934
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Church v. Meadow Springs Ranch Corp., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
- Thornock v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- Olsen v. Park Daughters Investment CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1973
- Ash v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- Holland v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.