Legal Opinion

San Diego Improvement Co. v. Brodie

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 12434PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

The defendants Percy W. Marshall and Alice C. Marshall appeal from a judgment quieting the title of plaintiff, San Diego Improvement Company, to certain lots situate in Oceanside, San Diego County, in a portion of said town known as Butler’s, Groves’ and Gleichner’s Addition.

The appellants filed an answer in the form of a general denial, but did not set up an affirmative claim of title in themselves. Upon the trial they introduced no evidence whatsoever. As persons not shown to have any right, title or interest in said property, they invoke the rule that the plaintiff in an action to quiet…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rockey v. VieuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Scott v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Kilfoil v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Krug v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Pearson v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ernie v. Trinity Lutheran ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Central National Bank v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Coffin v. Odd Fellows Hall Ass'n of ModestoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Jaffray v. MiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Tobin v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API