Martin v. Lloyd
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Ventura County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an action to quiet title. Judgment went for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal from the judgment, and from an order denying a new trial.
The land in dispute is a narrow wedge-shaped piece, with the point to the south, and widening as it runs northerly. The northerly end of the piece is a certain ravine, called the San Juan or Graveyard barranca.
On the east side of the strip in dispute there is a piece of land called the “ Price tract,” which commences at the lower or southerly end of the land in dispute, and runs along it northerly about one third of the distance up to the barranca.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Haley v. AmestoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Mayo v. MazeauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Irwin v. TowneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by19 opinions
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Bunger v. GrimmSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Murray v. Tulare Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Carter v. RayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Moylan v. DykesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.