Redd v. Murry
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tu-lare County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.
Action to quiet title. The plaintiff recovered judgment in the superior court, and the defendants appeal. The plaintiff claims the land in controversy by virtue of a deed made to her by the defendant J. P. Murry, in June, 1871, in which the land conveyed to her is described as “situate, lying, and being in Porterville, county of Tulare, state of California, and bounded and particularly described as follows, to wit: on the north, two hundred and forty feet on Mill Street; on the east, one hundred and ten feet on a thirty-foot alley; on the south, two hundred and forty feet on an alley; on the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Caldwell v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
3Cited by10 opinions
- Aalwyn's Law Institute v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- McLean v. LadewigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Hebden v. BinaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Kilfoil v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Wheeler v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.