Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Minneapolis, Anoka & Cuyuna Range Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 17, 1922No. 22,929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

Plaintiff was the owner of a motor truck and brought an action for damages resulting from a collision between the truck and defendant’s street car. He recovered a verdict and defendant appealed from a denial of its motion for a new trial.

The collision occurred at the intersection of Eighth avenue Northeast and Second street Northeast in the city iof Minneapolis. There is a double line' of street car tracks on Second street. At the time *375of the accident the street car was southbound on the westerly track and the truck was eastbound on Eighth avenue. The streets were dry and it was near…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carver v. BagleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  2. Kelley v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Soderberg v. TaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Weiss v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Wegmann v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Henjum v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  4. Joncas v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. King v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API