Legal Opinion

King v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 14, 1926No. 25,335PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to recover damages for an injury to the plaintiff’s automobile through a collision with a street car of the defendant. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. Defendant moved in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial. The court ordered judgment notwithstanding. The plaintiff appeals.

The court was of the view that the plaintiff as a matter of law was negligent and that his negligence contributed to the injury. If the order is sustained it must be for the reason given, or because as a matter of law the defendant was not negligent.

The plaintiff was driving south on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Wegmann v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Armstrong v. Minneapolis, Anoka & Cuyuna Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Joncas v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API