King v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to recover damages for an injury to the plaintiff’s automobile through a collision with a street car of the defendant. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. Defendant moved in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial. The court ordered judgment notwithstanding. The plaintiff appeals.
The court was of the view that the plaintiff as a matter of law was negligent and that his negligence contributed to the injury. If the order is sustained it must be for the reason given, or because as a matter of law the defendant was not negligent.
The plaintiff was driving south on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bradley v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Wegmann v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Armstrong v. Minneapolis, Anoka & Cuyuna Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
3Cited by1 opinion
- Joncas v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926