Soderberg v. Taney
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
On September 2, 1920, at about 12:30 p. m. plaintiff was driving Ms automobile north on Third avenue South in the city of Minneapolis. At the same time defendant was driving an automobile west on Twenty-sixth street, which intersects Third avenue at right angles. There was a standard with a red globe on it in the center of the intersection, placed there to warn drivers that the intersection was a dangerous one. It is in the closely brnlt up residential por*377tion of the city and there is much travel on both streets. Plaintiff and defendant were equally familiar with the locality. There…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gibbs v. AlmstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Syck v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Lindahl v. MorseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Kunz v. Thorp Fire-Proof Door Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Anderson v. A. E. Jenney Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bradley v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Guthrie v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Lachance, Admr. v. MyersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- Robertson v. SpitlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Armstrong v. Minneapolis, Anoka & Cuyuna Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.