Legal Opinion

Wegmann v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 30, 1925No. 24,854PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to recover damages occasioned by a collision with a car of the defendant street railway company. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant moved in the alternative for judgment or a new trial. The motion for judgment was granted and the plaintiff appeals. The question is whether the evidence establishes the plaintiff’s contributory negligence as a matter of law.

University avenue extends easterly and westerly at the point of the collision. At that point Washington avenue comes into University avenue from the southwest but does not cross it'. The street car tracks turn…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Kies v. SearlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Holman v. IvinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. Armstrong v. Minneapolis, Anoka & Cuyuna Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. Attebury v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Greenwood v. Evergreen Mines Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. Ferran v. MulcrevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Jude v. JudeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API