Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 26, 1924No. 24,310PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, C. j;

A street car operated by defendant collided with a truck driven by plaintiff at the intersection of East Hennepin avenue and East Island avenue in Minneapolis. East Hennepin runs east and west; East Island intersects, approaching from the north. It does not cross. Plaintiff traveled southerly onto East Hennepin and the street car was going west. Plaintiff sustained injuries for which he was given a verdict for $12,000. Defendant has appealed from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstand ing the verdict or for a new trial. Defendant’s appeal presents three…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Shea v. St. Paul City Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Rosenau v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Gibbs v. AlmstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Watson v. Minneapolis Street-Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. Carson v. TurrishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jeddeloh v. HockenhullSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Baltimore Transit Co. v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  3. Wilson v. Co-Operative Transit Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Quinn v. ZimmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Bell v. PickettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API