Legal Opinion
Ingham v. Luxor Cab Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 15, 2001No. A093683PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
Statement of the Case
Mary E. Ingham filed a complaint against respondent Luxor Cab Company alleging wrongful ejectment and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress. The trial court granted respondent summary judgment and denied appellant’s motion for reconsideration. We reverse.
Statement of Facts
Appellant is a 57-year-old woman who has suffered from diabetes since 1978. As a result, she experiences kidney failure requiring dialysis, diabetic neuropathy causing numbness and pain in her limbs and body, carpal tunnel syndrome, and depression requiring…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- DeJung v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- McIntosh v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- HIM v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Kramer v. SzczepaniakAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
- People ex rel. City of Dana Point v. Holistic HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.