Legal Opinion
DeJung v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 19, 2008No. A116911PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUVOLO, P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Appellant Theodore DeJung (DeJung), formerly employed as a commissioner by respondent Sonoma County Superior Court (Superior Court), brought an age discrimination case against the Superior Court under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.). The trial court granted the Superior Court’s motion for summary judgment, finding (1) the Superior Court is protected from suit under FEHA based on the affirmative defense of discretionary immunity (§§ 815.2, subd. (b), 820.2), and (2) DeJung did not raise a triable issue of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Brianna Bolden-Hardge v. California State ControllerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund v. City of AlamedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Tichinin v. City of Morgan HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Cornell v. Berkeley Tennis Club, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Kight v. Cashcall, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.