Legal Opinion
People ex rel. City of Dana Point v. Holistic Health
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 13, 2013No. G045453PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARONSON, J.
A medical marijuana collective, Holistic Health, and its president, Garrison Williams (collectively, Holistic Health), appeal from the *1020trial court’s entry of judgment in favor of the City of Dana Point (the City) following the City’s summary judgment motion on nuisance abatement and illegal business practices causes of action. Holistic Health contends summary judgment was improper because triable issues of fact existed on a critical disputed issue: whether Holistic Health, incorporated as a nonprofit, actually operated in that manner in compliance with state medical…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Taylor v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- People v. KarisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Charles H. Keating, Jr. v. Office of Thrift SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- People v. MowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Dalessandro v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Dispatch & Tracking Solutions v. City of San Diego CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2016
- S.F. Print Media Co. v. The Hearst Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- The People v. SolisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013