Legal Opinion

HIM v. City and County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 13, 2005No. A108117PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMONS, J.—

Background

Cheat Phay committed suicide in March 2001, while an inpatient of the Acute Psychiatry Service at San Francisco General Hospital. On August 30, 2001, defendant City and County of San Francisco (City) received government tort claims on behalf of plaintiffs Phay Him and Van Nun, the parents of the decedent. On November 19, 2001, representatives of the City purportedly mailed formal notices rejecting the claims to plaintiffs’ counsel. The notices warned that any action on the claims had to be filed within six months of the date the notices were mailed, pursuant to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Craig v. Brown & Root, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Forslund v. ForslundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Douglas v. JanisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Dowell v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. (PS)Clark v. AllisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  2. Andrews v. Metropolitan Transit SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  3. Mkrtchyan v. Sacramento CountyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. Ross v. County of LakeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
  5. Ross v. County of LakeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API