Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kramer v. Szczepaniak

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 19, 2018No. 1-17-1411UnpublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ellis

*705 ¶ 1 After a late night at the movies, Jasmine Vega and Sean Kramer requested *706 *435 a ride home using the popular ride-sharing app Uber. Defendant Farid Kessanti responded to the request, and with that, Vega and Kramer began their journey home. According to the complaint, Kessanti proved to be a less than able driver: He did not know how to get to Vega's and Kramer's intended destination, took several wrong turns, and got lost. When Kramer pointed this out to Kessanti and offered to help with directions, Kessanti became irate and kicked Vega and Kramer out of his car-at around two in the morning.

¶…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Lee v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Merlo v. Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Thompson v. GordonIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  5. City of Chicago v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Inman v. Howe Freightways, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  2. Kramer v. SzczepaniakAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  3. Abrams v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2022
  4. Archibald v. SinghDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2020
  5. City of Chicago v. Purdue Pharma L.P.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API