McIntosh v. Mills
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUVOLO, J.
L
INTRODUCTION
Appellant J. Nicholas McIntosh appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of respondent Robert W. Mills (Mills). The trial court granted Mills’s summary judgment after concluding, as a matter of law, that an alleged 2 agreement to share a legal fee (the fee-sharing agreement) entered into between Mills, a member of the State Bar of California, and McIntosh, a nonattomey, was unenforceable. 3 In reviewing the matter de novo, we agree that the fee-sharing agreement was unenforceable under the doctrine of illegality of contract. Further, we conclude that no…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Brown v. GrimesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- DeJung v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Shopoff & Cavallo LLP v. HyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 2018
- Medina v. Safe-Guard Products, International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.