Legal Opinion

State v. Bronson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 25, 1993No. CR 91-0089 CR 91-0090 CR 91-0117 CA A73868 (Control) CA A73869 CA A73870PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for unlawful sale of wildlife. ORS 496.992. We reverse.

Defendant is an enrolled member of the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation. He was prosecuted for three incidents of unlawful sale of elk. Defendant entered not guilty pleas and requested a court-appointed attorney. The trial was continued twice over an 11-month period by defendant’s appointed counsel. The day before the trial was scheduled to start, defendant asked the judge for a new lawyer. The next day, the court denied defendant’s request as untimely, but dismissed defendant’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. HeapsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. State v. JimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SoaresHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State v. KeerinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Elkins v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. State v. GrcichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Combs v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API