Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 18, 1991No. 89-C-21124; CA A68012PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant was convicted of assault in the second degree and possession of a weapon by an inmate. ORS 163.175; ORS 166.275. He appeals, contending that the trial court erred by denying his request for substitute counsel and refusing to permit him to represent himself. We reverse.

A week before his trial was scheduled to begin, defendant asked the court to appoint substitute counsel because,

“I don’t feel I’m being accurately [sic] represented. * * * I’ve been trying to have this man do things for me, and he doesn’t seem to want to help me out * *

The court responded, “I wouldn’t have appointed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. VernaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  2. State v. HeapsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. State v. MeyrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. Bargas-PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. BronsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API