Legal Opinion

State v. Heaps

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 23, 1987No. DA 330866-8610; CA A42991PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for assaulting a public safety officer. ORS 163.208. He contends, inter alia, that the trial court erred in denying his request for a second appointed counsel after he had a disagreement with his first appointed counsel. The issue is whether the trial court failed to exercise its discretion and, therefore, committed error in denying defendant’s request for substitute counsel. We reverse.

Defendant, an indigent, was arrested in October, 1986. Counsel was appointed and trial was set for December 6. Thereafter, a conflict developed between defendant and his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. State v. PaganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Temple v. ZenonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. State v. KeerinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API