State v. Heaps
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for assaulting a public safety officer. ORS 163.208. He contends, inter alia, that the trial court erred in denying his request for a second appointed counsel after he had a disagreement with his first appointed counsel. The issue is whether the trial court failed to exercise its discretion and, therefore, committed error in denying defendant’s request for substitute counsel. We reverse.
Defendant, an indigent, was arrested in October, 1986. Counsel was appointed and trial was set for December 6. Thereafter, a conflict developed between defendant and his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. PaganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Temple v. ZenonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. KeerinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.