Legal Opinion
Combs v. Baldwin
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 7, 1999No. CV 96-1300; CA A99355PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his writ of habeas corpus. ORS 34.310 et seq. He assigns as error the failure of the trial court to inquire into the reasons that he sought substitution of appointed counsel. We reverse.
Plaintiff is an inmate at the Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution. Apparently, he committed the crimes for which he is incarcerated before 1993. In 1996, the board extended plaintiffs parole release date to October 2002. Plaintiff filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging, in part:
“Plaintiffs parole date of 10-27-2002 is not legal because of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lutz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- State v. HeapsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Elkins v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Phillips v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Hieu Doan Truong v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Steltz v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Phillips v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.