Legal Opinion

State v. Keerins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 31, 1996No. 95P-3311; CA A90702PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for robbery in the second degree. ORS 164.405. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of a continuance so that he could hire substitute counsel and argues that he was unconstitutionally sentenced under Ballot Measure 11, a voter initiative mandating minimum sentences for certain felonies. We affirm.

Defendant’s conviction stems from a shop-lifting incident at the Payless store in Dallas, Oregon, on May 18, 1995. Because force was used against a store security guard, defendant was indicted for robbery in the second degree. He was arraigned…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. LawlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. HeapsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. FerraroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. HugCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. State v. DuBoisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. State v. MakinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API