State v. Keerins
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for robbery in the second degree. ORS 164.405. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of a continuance so that he could hire substitute counsel and argues that he was unconstitutionally sentenced under Ballot Measure 11, a voter initiative mandating minimum sentences for certain felonies. We affirm.
Defendant’s conviction stems from a shop-lifting incident at the Payless store in Dallas, Oregon, on May 18, 1995. Because force was used against a store security guard, defendant was indicted for robbery in the second degree. He was arraigned…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. LawlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. HeapsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. FerraroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. HugCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- State v. DuBoisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- State v. MakinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.