Legal Opinion
State v. Jim
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 10, 1986No. 2383; CA A33806PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*191BUTTLER, P. J.
Defendant was convicted of unlawful sale of wildlife. ORS 498.022. On appeal, he raises numerous assignments of error. Because we agree with defendant that the state has not established that it has jurisdiction over this offense, we do not address the other assignments.
Defendant is an enrolled member of the Warm Springs Confederated Tribes. He was convicted of selling a deer, which, pursuant to a tribal permit, had been lawfully killed on the Warm Springs Indian Reservation. The sale occurred off the reservation on land ceded by the Confederated Tribes to the United States under…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Baldwin v. Fish and Game Comm'n of Mont.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Antoine v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Puyallup Tribe v. Department of Game of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. JimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. BronsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Confederated Tribes of Colville Reservation v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2011
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.