Legal Opinion

State v. Barnett

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 27, 1979No. 78 3331, CA 14479PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions of rape in the third degree, ORS 163.355, 1 and sodomy in the third degree, ORS 163.385. 2 He assigns error to the trial court’s refusal to subpena the victim’s venereal disease records, the court’s refusal to appoint counsel for his defense, the court’s refusal to grant a continuance, and the court’s overruling of his demurrer. We affirm.

Defendant requested that the victim’s venereal disease records be subpenaed on the basis that, if those records showed, as defendant stated they would, that the victim had venereal disease at the time that defendant was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. TwittyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. State v. HeapsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. State v. RochaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. State v. BronsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API