Morch v. Toledo, Saginaw & Muskegon Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon; Russell, J. Case by John Morch against the Toledo, Saginaw & Muskegon Railway Company for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The plaintiff sued defendant to recover for seyere personal injuries received by him while he was in the employ of defendant, and recovered a judgment, from which defendant appeals. The avocation of plaintiff was that of a section hand on defendant’s road. At the time he received his injuries he was standing upon the steps *155or platform of the front end of the caboose, which was attached to a train consisting largely of flat cars loaded with ties. The train was in motion. The men would throw one end of the tie off the train,.and the motion of the train would carry the other end of the tie…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Quincy Mining Co. v. KittsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Harrison v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Schroeder v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Erickson v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Palmer v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Corey v. Joliet Bridge & Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Amoe v. Great Lakes Engineering WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- La Barre v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
- McCauley v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1911