Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1892PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Gogebic. (Haire, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This case was in this Court on appeal from the order of the court below sustaining a demurrer to the declaration, and is reported in 83 Mich. 281. It was there said:

“If it is true that the plaintiff, while acting under the foreman or boss, ivas ordered by him to pull the coupling-pin and jump across to the other car, and, without any notice to the plaintiff, the foreman let off the brake, which suddenly accelerated the speed of the car and widened the distance which plaintiff was to jump, and the plaintiff had no knowledge or information that the brake was to be let off, and by that means the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harrison v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Erickson v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. DoeMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Lorimer v. LorimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Erickson v. SoyarsMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Steeg v. St. Paul City Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. Cristanelli v. Saginaw Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API