Harrison v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLons, J.
This action is brought to recover for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff through the claimed negligence of the servants of the defendant. On the trial the plaintiff had verdict and judgment for $9,000.
The plaintiff had been in the employ of the defendant company for about eight years, though for some portion of that time he had been laid off, by direction of those in charge of the works of the company. During that time, his employment had been confined to the work as a section foreman, and hand under a section boss. At the time of the injuries complained of one G-eorge Light was the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Flike v. . Boston and Albany R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Barbaroux v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1862
- Chapman v. . Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Holden v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Malone v. . HathawayNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- VanDusen v. LetellierMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Jackson v. Norfolk & W. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
- Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated Railway Co. v. HanningIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Sherwood v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.