Quincy Mining Co. v. Kitts
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to’ Houghton. Trespass on the case. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
Kitts sued the mining company to recover damages for an injury alleged to have been suffered' by himself through the company’s negligence while in its employ as a miner. The declaration is given in the margin.* It appears from the evidence that what in *37the declaration is called a bridge over the chasm where the accident occurred, consisted merely of two timbers laid side by side, one of which broke and fell with the plaintiff as he was passing over. The timbers were of pine, and had been, in place some five years. The evidence tended to show that they disclosed no defect when put in, and that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Davis v. Detroit & Milwaukee Rail RoadMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Wonder v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
- Malone v. . HathawayNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Hard v. Vermont & Canada RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
3Cited by60 opinions
- Felgner v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Sayward v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Adams v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Hunn v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Michigan Central R. R. Co. v. SmithsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.