Schroeder v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Olair. (Vance, J.) Negligence case. Defendant Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad Company brings error. The facts are stated in the opinions.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
The liability of the defendant the Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad Company, under the instructions of the court, depends upon the position occupied by Mehalski, the boss or foreman of the gang of 10 men who-were occupied in unloading and leveling the dirt hauled upon its premises by the defendant the Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Company. The sole negligence alleged as ground for recovery against the Flint & Pere Marquette road is that Mehalski failed to give notice to his co-employés that the train was about to move. Before discussing this question, I desire to state that, in my judgment,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Flike v. . Boston and Albany R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Crispin v. . BabbittNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Quincy Mining Co. v. KittsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Hunn v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- VanDusen v. LetellierMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Petaja v. Aurora Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Balhoff v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Thomas v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Mikolojczak v. North American Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.