Legal Opinion

Michigan Bulb Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1953No. Docket 3; Calendar 45,651PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.

Plaintiff appeals from judgment of no cause for action in its suit to recover 2 employer’s unemployment compensation contributions paid by it, under protest, to defendant commission, covering the fourth period of 1949 and the first period of 1950.

Plaintiff is engaged in the mail-order business of selling bulbs and nursery stock at retail. During the periods in question it was subject to the unemployment compensation act (PA 1936 [Ex Sess], No 1, as amended [CL 1948, § 421.1 et seq. (Stat Ann 1950 Rev § 17.501 et seq.) ]). A number of years ago it began to need, for the distribution of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nordman v. CalhounMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  2. ACME Messenger Service Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. O'Brian v. Michigan Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Palmer v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Bert Baker, Inc. v. RyceMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Powell v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. R. H. McManus Co. v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. McMANUS CO. v. EMPLOY. SECU. COMM.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Powell v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Powell v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API