Legal Opinion

Nordman v. Calhoun

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1952No. Docket 68, 69, Calendar 45,292, 45,293PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The issue in these 2 cases arises ont of the claims of Ardath Calhoun and Dorothy H. Mulnix to unemployment compensation. The referee held in each case that one of the employment units for which each worked during her base period, namely, the Top Notch Soda Bar, did not constitute a liable employer under the terms of the Michigan unemployment compensation act during that period. Upon appeal, the appeal board reversed the referee and held that the Top Notch Soda Bar employed 8 or more individuals in 20 or more calendar weeks, during the calendar year 1949 and was an employer under the terms of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Twitchell v. BlodgettMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. MacQueen v. City CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. ACME Messenger Service Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. O'Brian v. Michigan Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Graystone Ballroom, Inc. v. BaggottMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Judges' Retirement BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Jones v. Grand Ledge Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Metropolitan Council No 23 v. Oakland County ProsecutorMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Great Lakes Steel Corp. v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Oakland County Prosecutor v. 46th District JudgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API