Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Unemployment Compensation Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1945No. Docket No. 11, Calendar No. 42,529PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuizel, J.

The question raised in this appeal is whether the word “employer” as used in the Michigan unemployment compensation act (Act No. 1, Pub. Acts 1936 [Ex. Sess.], as amended by Act No. 347, Pub. Acts 1937 [Comp. Laws Supp. 1937, § 8485-41 et seq., Stat. Ann. 1938 Cum. Supp. § 17.501 et seq.) applies to plaintiffs under the particular facts in the instant case.

A petition for certiorari was filed by plaintiffs- in the circuit court for Ingham county to review questions of fact and law as determined in an order of defendant affirming assessments for unemployment compensation for the years 1938 and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moline Properties, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Griffiths v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. ACME Messenger Service Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. O'Brian v. Michigan Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Bert Baker, Inc. v. RyceMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Copper Range Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Lyons v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Intertown Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Bonifas-Gorman Lumber Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API