Legal Opinion

Bert Baker, Inc. v. Ryce

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1942No. Docket No. 52, Calendar No. 41,376PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChandler, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for the county of Ingham, affirming the findings of the appeal board and referee of the unemployment compensation commission that Robert Ryce, Jr., was an employee of appellant, Bert Baker, Inc., and entitled to benefits under Act No. 1, Pub. Acts 1936 (Ex. Sess.), as amended, known as the Michigan unemployment compensation act.

The facts are not in dispute. The question presented to us is: Under the facts presented was the claimant an employee of the appellant within the meaning of the unemployment compensation law?

Bert Baker, Inc., a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gall v. Detroit Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Carleton v. Foundry & Machine Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Odle v. Charcoal Iron Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Wright v. Big Rapids Door & Blind Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Bacon v. CandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. ACME Messenger Service Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Bonifas-Gorman Lumber Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Seattle Aerie No. 1 of Fraternal Order of Eagles v. Commissioner of Unemployment Compensation & PlacementWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Commercial Motor Freight, Inc. v. EbrightOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Palmer v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API