Legal Opinion · Dissent

Powell v. Employment Security Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1956No. Docket 17, Calendar 46,517Published

1DissentSmith, J.

I cannot agree that the Michigan employment security act* denies to the worker before us the status of an employee.

The question is whether or not Rebecca Cohen’s work constituted “employment” within the meaning of the act. The term “employment” is defined in the act as follows:

“Subject to the other provisions of this section 'employment’ means service, including service in interstate- commerce, performed for remuneration or under any contract of hire, written or oral, express or implied.” (CLS 1954, §421.42 [1] [Stat Ann 1953 Cum Supp § 17.545 (1)].)

*463“Remuneration,” referred to above, is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. De Forrest v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Salmon v. Bagley Laundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API