Powell v. Employment Security Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.
The controlling question here for decision is whether one Rebecca Cohen, who was paid by plaintiffs-appellants $1 for each photograph negative she “retouched” for the studio, was their employee, or an independent, contractor, under the *457Michigan employment security act,* formerly called the Michigan unemployment compensation act.
The usual statutory processes have been followed within the defendant commission, culminating in the appeal to this Court from a judgment entered in the circuit court for Wayne county holding that Rebecca Cohen was an employee of the plaintiffs within the meaning of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tuttle v. Embury-Martin Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Dennis v. Sinclair Lumber & Fuel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Bonifas-Gorman Lumber Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Pazan v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
- Lewis v. SummersMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Wells v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Kirby v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Nichol v. BillotMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Woody v. WaibelOregon Supreme Court · 1976
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.