Legal Opinion

Powell v. Employment Security Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1956No. Docket 17, Calendar 46,517PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

The controlling question here for decision is whether one Rebecca Cohen, who was paid by plaintiffs-appellants $1 for each photograph negative she “retouched” for the studio, was their employee, or an independent, contractor, under the *457Michigan employment security act,* formerly called the Michigan unemployment compensation act.

The usual statutory processes have been followed within the defendant commission, culminating in the appeal to this Court from a judgment entered in the circuit court for Wayne county holding that Rebecca Cohen was an employee of the plaintiffs within the meaning of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. Embury-Martin Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Dennis v. Sinclair Lumber & Fuel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Bonifas-Gorman Lumber Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Pazan v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Lewis v. SummersMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Wells v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Kirby v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Nichol v. BillotMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Woody v. WaibelOregon Supreme Court · 1976

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API